She appears to be carrying Baby Darth Maul. Or a tiger cub. No way to be sure.
Alan on
October 3rd, 2008 2:24 pm
OH, so that’s the kind of people who like Sarah Palin. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I’ll go make a donation to Barack Obama now.
Dan on
October 3rd, 2008 4:16 pm
Yes Alan, some people like to exercise their right to protect themselves and loved ones. Others choose to assume the fetal position and wait for a miracle.
Lissa on
October 3rd, 2008 5:10 pm
Oh man. I know of these people online. Huge trainwreck.
Ali on
October 3rd, 2008 10:19 pm
Boinker - they’re called stretch marks.
mad_science on
October 4th, 2008 12:10 am
Yeah Dan, because pointing the gun directing at the cameraman* is responsible gun ownership behavior.
Wannabe-macho gun porn is not what the 2nd amendment is all about.
*in fairness, it could be a tripod and auto-timer
boinker on
October 4th, 2008 12:12 am
Gee thanks, Ali. I didn’t know they were really stretch marks and not tiger stripes.
Dan on
October 6th, 2008 11:17 am
mad_science: I agree, pointing a gun at anything you’re not willing to destroy is not a good idea. Let’s just hope it was a camera on a tripod.
I don’t know about happy family - she doesn’t seem to be wearing a ring. Someone alert the jeebus-huggers!
Manny on
October 10th, 2008 5:18 pm
Wow… I think I will stay home now.
Sascha on
October 16th, 2008 9:13 pm
Yep they’re stretch marks but you CAN do something about them, like use Cocoa Butter or Vitamen E. Just because you’re in cahoots with the guy holding the gun doesn’t mean you shouldn’t take care of yourself. She’s going to have a hell of a time getting rid of those, if ever
Naughtyhippo on
October 27th, 2008 10:30 am
@Sascha, you can’t do nuthin about stretch marks. You’ve just been brainwashed by the moisturizing people
“I don’t know about happy family - she doesn’t seem to be wearing a ring.”
Pregnant women often don’t; the fingers swell, and resizing the rings several times is not particularly good on the metal. My wife had to start wearing hers on a necklace at about 4mo, and this woman is obviously well beyond that point.
Feel free to leave a comment... and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!
She appears to be carrying Baby Darth Maul. Or a tiger cub. No way to be sure.
OH, so that’s the kind of people who like Sarah Palin. Thanks for clearing that up for me. I’ll go make a donation to Barack Obama now.
Yes Alan, some people like to exercise their right to protect themselves and loved ones. Others choose to assume the fetal position and wait for a miracle.
Oh man. I know of these people online. Huge trainwreck.
Boinker - they’re called stretch marks.
Yeah Dan, because pointing the gun directing at the cameraman* is responsible gun ownership behavior.
Wannabe-macho gun porn is not what the 2nd amendment is all about.
*in fairness, it could be a tripod and auto-timer
Gee thanks, Ali. I didn’t know they were really stretch marks and not tiger stripes.
mad_science: I agree, pointing a gun at anything you’re not willing to destroy is not a good idea. Let’s just hope it was a camera on a tripod.
Is he protecting her, or holding her hostage?
I don’t know about happy family - she doesn’t seem to be wearing a ring. Someone alert the jeebus-huggers!
Wow… I think I will stay home now.
Yep they’re stretch marks but you CAN do something about them, like use Cocoa Butter or Vitamen E. Just because you’re in cahoots with the guy holding the gun doesn’t mean you shouldn’t take care of yourself. She’s going to have a hell of a time getting rid of those, if ever
@Sascha, you can’t do nuthin about stretch marks. You’ve just been brainwashed by the moisturizing people
“I don’t know about happy family - she doesn’t seem to be wearing a ring.”
Pregnant women often don’t; the fingers swell, and resizing the rings several times is not particularly good on the metal. My wife had to start wearing hers on a necklace at about 4mo, and this woman is obviously well beyond that point.