Top

Quite Possibly The Worst Invention Ever

March 13, 2008 

Dog Running Board

From the June 1936 issue of Popular Mechanics comes this really terrible idea of basically strapping your dog to the side of the car. While I’m sure Mitt Romney would have loved one of these I think it’s a good thing they didn’t catch on.

Enjoy this post? Share it: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Mixx

Like This? Then Check Out:

Actually, This Might Be The Worst Invention Ever
Worst Name Ever
Possibly The Best Tattoo Ever
Not A Terribly Fun Job
Quite Possibly The Luckiest Kid In The World
Worst Analysis Ever?
Easily The Worst Sports Tattoo Ever

Or, Maybe You're Feeling A Little Random?:

Random Post



Comments

62 Responses to “Quite Possibly The Worst Invention Ever”

  1. RWW on March 13th, 2008 9:14 pm

    It’s not so bad if you think about how slow cars were…

  2. Jesus H Christ on March 13th, 2008 10:51 pm

    WTF, that the best idea ever

  3. onats on March 13th, 2008 11:14 pm

    The running boards on those old style cars were like at least six inches wide… come on… its not that bad… hehehe

  4. gfixler on March 14th, 2008 12:40 am

    There’s an alternate model available, if you’re not driving.

  5. Ariel on March 14th, 2008 12:55 am

    It’s not a bad idea at all! In 1936 cars did not drive very fast at all, so it was probably quite safe.

  6. Babson on March 14th, 2008 1:13 am

    If only Mitt Romney had used this.

    He wouldn’t have had shit all over his car and would not have looked like such an arseclown

  7. Mercedes on March 14th, 2008 2:02 am

    That’s insane! Purely insane! Hilarious, I’m glad I saw this picture (my laugh of the day) but I still say it’s insane! xD

  8. John on March 14th, 2008 2:09 am

    looks like the driver is about to smack the dog in the head with the door.

  9. Alejandro on March 14th, 2008 3:26 am

    hahahaha i LOVE it, i prefer putting them in the back of a truck, i hate having animals inside a car or house for that matter.

  10. Ryan on March 14th, 2008 4:21 am

    I think that dogs going to get smacked in the head with that door when the driver gets out.

  11. olde timer on March 14th, 2008 4:25 am

    I remember those… We called them Romneys.

  12. RP on March 14th, 2008 4:42 am

    I have one of those for my neice. She loves it. If I go really fast she goes ‘Yay!’

    At least I think she’s having fun, it’s hard to tell over the sound of the engine.

  13. dispatches from TJICistan » Blog Archive » the worst invention ever on March 14th, 2008 6:00 am

    [...] The thing is, I think most dogs would enjoy it. [...]

  14. martoon on March 14th, 2008 6:09 am

    where’s his goggles?

  15. Andrew on March 14th, 2008 6:13 am

    Mitt Romney needed one of these. =)

  16. Dick on March 14th, 2008 7:31 am

    Awesome! Anyone know where I can get one?

  17. Mitt on March 14th, 2008 7:33 am

    new for 1936 from the Mitt Romney Inc. family of fine products

  18. Culprititus on March 14th, 2008 7:56 am

    Don’t dogs start to lose their sight from the wind and particles when riding with a head out a window. This looks to be much worse in that case.

  19. MD on March 14th, 2008 8:02 am

    I really don’t see how this merits your title of “The Worst Invention Ever.” The idea is both practical, and functional. The two problems would be 1) driving so fast that the dog is uncomfortable, and 2) driving carelessly and injuring the dog by “clipping” another vehicle or object.

    Since it’s from 1936, a full twenty years before the creation of the Interstate Highway System, car speeds were much lower; even today, most roads have speed limits of less than 30 mph, I doubt the dog would be uncomfortable and most dogs I know enjoy having their head out the window, this provides a similar opportunity.

    Second, this varies based on the size of your dog, but I am sure one can take extra care when driving around with their dog; just as people have to take extra care when bringing large objects home from Home Depot, or strapping bicycles or other equipment to the back of the car or roof. Also, there were not as many cars on the road even in urban areas, so the likelihood of hitting another car decreases.

    Finally, as a slight modification to improve canine safety, one could add a light metal frame, or form the main body of the dog carrier out of a material similar to the body of the car, creating a rigid structure or environment that would protect the dog from passing foliage, or a slight bump.

    In conclusion, you’re an idiot. This invention is great, and I plan to purchase a red one with a racing stripe immediately; it has to match the color scheme of my Dodge Viper.

  20. Eric Berlin » Blog Archive » Howling in terror, but comfortably on March 14th, 2008 8:47 am

    [...] Via John Scalzi, ingenuity for the car-owning dog lover, circa 1936. [...]

  21. maarken on March 14th, 2008 8:55 am

    I don’t know, I can think of a few dogs who would think this would be great fun.

  22. Tico on March 14th, 2008 9:01 am

    Mitt? Mitt Romney? Is that you?

  23. Kate on March 14th, 2008 9:22 am

    Maybe you should alert Mitt Romney.

  24. braine on March 14th, 2008 9:25 am

    This doesn’t bug me that much — if cars still had wide running boards, why not? Dogs love to hang their heads out the window of a moving car, the whole gizmo looks pretty secure, and its profile doesn’t extend beyond the fenders/running board.

    The one hitch I see is…how did the driver close his door? That’s a recipe for disaster.

  25. sarah on March 14th, 2008 10:09 am

    Quite Possibly The BEST Invention Ever.

  26. Andrew on March 14th, 2008 10:13 am

    Gotta say- title is a bit over the top, as I kind of think maybe the nuclear bomb might have a slightly better claim to that but……….

    and also, Alejandro, thanks so much for letting the rest of us know what a total asshole you are! What a neat person!

  27. RayOsunshine on March 14th, 2008 10:28 am

    It’s like having an extra side impact airbag. :)

  28. Shawn on March 14th, 2008 10:33 am

    If you don’t like having animals in the inside of your house or car…..DON’T GET AN ANIMAL ARESHOLE!!!!!!! Do me a favor and put yourself out there and then we would have less idiots in the world.

  29. Richard on March 14th, 2008 10:41 am

    Yes, I always did thing the car was the worst invention ever. Seriously.

  30. PENIX on March 14th, 2008 10:55 am

    Do they make a larger model to accommodate my wife?

  31. Mudita4 on March 14th, 2008 11:32 am

    Don’t you think maybe the Victorian-era spiked ring designed to stop a young boy from having nocturnal erections was perhaps a worse invention?

    Ack…

  32. carl on March 14th, 2008 11:34 am

    How on earth could this be a good idea? It’s like begging for the animal to have an accident.

    The people saying “it’s not such a bad idea, really” are about as stupid, ignorant and careless as the inventor.

  33. Alan Thicke on March 14th, 2008 1:00 pm

    @Shawn
    Sometimes we also use them for people with no sense of humor or perspective.

  34. Kate on March 14th, 2008 1:31 pm

    While this is obviously not a good idea in the present, you have to remember that in 1936, cars went a lot slower than they do now. In fact, I remember reading a collector’s card for a 1932 vintage automobile at a car show that my dad took me to a few years ago. The card, which was a reproduction of the copy used to advertise the car stated that the car could achieve “a breakneck speed of 37 miles per hour”. Mind you, that was top speed. The normal average speed that people drove back then was probably more like 20 mph. And as someone else stated the running boards on cars back then were usually 6 to 8 inches wide. And with far less vehicles on the roads, it’s really not that risky. I wouldn’t do this to my dog, but people had much different sensibilities about animals back then. You can’t judge the culture of 75 years ago with the frame of reference of living in 2008. That’s like Anthropology 101.

  35. josh on March 14th, 2008 2:51 pm

    this is the worse idea ever for this reason: rocks.

    you or other cars kick up rocks all the time, no matter the speed.

    Ever had a cracked windsheild from a rock?

    Ever have a dead dog from a rock?

  36. Maximus Gringo on March 14th, 2008 3:54 pm

    Mitt Romney! Just like a socialist liberal swine to take cheap shots and then claim people with family values are mean and cruel! If it was up to me all progressives would be required to wear a burka, male or female so they could be closer to the peace loving Muslims they continually suck up to!

  37. the constant skeptic on March 14th, 2008 9:18 pm

    @josh ever get a cracked windshield from a stupid comment?

  38. Some Yank on March 14th, 2008 9:45 pm

    @Alan Thicke– At least Shawn is somewhat interesting. Aren’t you not just the president of the Hair Club for Men, but also a client? Or were you the guy who wanted us to draw a cartoon and send it in to see if we had artistic ability? No, that’s right you were just the boring guy who tried to act.

  39. Palli on March 15th, 2008 12:17 pm

    How stupid can you possible be ? A little crash would kill the dog !

  40. earthmanandy on March 15th, 2008 10:09 pm

    Thanks, you gave me a true laugh! yes this is a terrible idea! however i actually think the worst invention ever was the chainsaw… followed by the car and closely followed by the atomic bomb… all highly debatable of course, but when the atmosphere has gone green and the earth no longer supports healthy life i expect everyone will agree, way too late!
    now, how about a set of rollerskates (x4) for cat lovers, so they can drag their cats around on leads instead of letting them roam around at night killing all the birdlife! better still they could tie them onto their cars and drive them around!

  41. wife on March 17th, 2008 5:23 pm

    I have one of these but my dog hates it. My daughter, however, totally digs it.

  42. puttputt on March 18th, 2008 10:55 am

    I HAVE A PATENT THAT TEACHES DOGS HOW TO DRIVE SO THEY CAN BE YOUR CHAUFFEUR.

  43. Ryan on March 18th, 2008 4:05 pm

    My dog would freak out if I tried to put him in that thing. You would prob have to clean the piss and shit out after each use.

  44. Andrew D on March 25th, 2008 6:11 pm

    Anyone else notice that the driver has to whack the dog’s head with the door when exiting the vehicle? Not to even mention what could happen with a good slam when getting in… *shudder*

  45. John on March 25th, 2008 8:47 pm

    Looks like a good idea to me assuming you don’t drive at highway speeds and have running boards. My dog LOVES to go for a ride. I don’t get the “Romney” references.

  46. Jeffrey on March 26th, 2008 7:11 pm

    Does Melonhead come to mind!? Worst Idea I have seen of late. How about we strap the wanna be genius to it instead and let the dog sit in the front passenger seat.
    Unreal,some people,gee-whiz.

  47. Nick on March 27th, 2008 5:36 pm

    Actually the worst invention ever would have to be the Revigator… this device makes your water radioactive so it is safe for you to drink!!!!!!! People and their fad dieting experiments. Mind you it was in the early 1900s

  48. Nancy Hanily Dolan on April 3rd, 2008 10:46 pm

    Personally, I think that this “Rubicon” thing I keep hearing about is the worst invention ever.

    I personally saw this daemonic force burn the eyebrows off of over 20,000 attendees of Burning Man.

    Back when it was, “cool”, I mean, of course. But then again, what. EVAR.

  49. Hydra on April 5th, 2008 7:50 pm

    Wallaces inventions rock.
    Poor Grommet though.

  50. Matthew Kowald on April 20th, 2008 2:57 am

    Terrific! I got to get me one of these for my kids!

  51. JimWilson on April 22nd, 2008 11:27 am

    I think the worst invention ever is actually the Rapex ‘anti-rape’ condom

  52. Silva on April 23rd, 2008 8:19 pm

    I don’t know why anyone would have a dog in the first place if they needed to keep it in a sack.

  53. This Is Unfortunate on April 28th, 2008 2:19 am

    Do they make one of these for kids?

  54. lobo on April 30th, 2008 1:50 pm

    Why can’t you just drag the bag behind the car?

  55. Mark on June 19th, 2008 1:39 pm

    There is a major problem — if you make a quick right turn, the sack and dog will swing out and then swing back, banging against the side of the car.

  56. voiceofreason on July 24th, 2008 2:29 am

    blimey, some people take these things far too seriously…..

  57. emmiii babii on July 27th, 2008 3:56 am

    i would never ever ever do that…its mean.

  58. jimbo on April 23rd, 2009 10:26 pm

    um,yeah. guns are by far and away THE worst invention ever made. either that or religion. take your pick.

  59. jamesk on May 31st, 2009 8:48 pm

    It’s not horrible but it is not safe in the year 2009. Because, the cars go fast.

  60. jamesk on May 31st, 2009 8:49 pm

    gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggghhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh jjjjjjjjjjkkkkkkkkkkkkk kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk

  61. MiMi on February 19th, 2010 3:05 pm

    you would think the dog would get smacked in the head with the door…but why wouldn’t they just put the dog inside the car and roll the window down?

  62. john on March 3rd, 2010 2:21 pm

    I will give a blank check to whoever gets me one of these genius devices.

Feel free to leave a comment...
and oh, if you want a pic to show with your comment, go get a gravatar!





Clicky Web Analytics
Bottom